THE HAGUE, NETHERLANDS — A two-day hearing concluded on Friday in the case brought by South Africa against Israel for alleged genocide against Palestinians. The case is being heard at the United Nations’ International Court of Justice. South Africa presented evidence arguing that Israel’s military campaign in Gaza has extended beyond its conflict with Hamas, the Palestinian militant group. They claimed that Israel’s offensive has targeted all 2 million Palestinians in Gaza. South Africa’s legal team argued that the extent of Israel’s killing has resulted in nowhere being safe in Gaza, with over 23,210 Palestinians killed during the military campaign. Israel strongly denies the allegations and argues that it is fighting terrorism, not committing genocide.
South Africa’s lawyers highlighted the suffering of Palestinian civilians and the destruction of families and homes in Gaza. They accused Israel of deliberately targeting civilians, including women and children, and described the situation in Gaza as a “graveyard for children.” They also pointed to comments made by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, referencing the biblical figure Amalek, as evidence of genocidal intent.
In response, Israel’s lawyers argued that South Africa’s case was based on a distorted and manipulated description of the reality of the conflict. They stressed the role of Hamas in instigating the conflict and accused South Africa of echoing Hamas’ rhetoric. Israel’s lawyers emphasized that their military campaign is in self-defense against terrorist organizations.
A ruling on the case may take years, and South Africa has called for a provisional ruling that could halt Israel’s military campaign and allow more aid to reach Palestinians. Compliance with provisional rulings from the International Court of Justice is not guaranteed, but they serve to reaffirm international values and obligations.
The case at the International Court of Justice highlights the ongoing conflict between Israel and Palestine and the international community’s efforts to address alleged human rights violations. The court’s ruling, whenever it may come, could have significant implications for Israel’s actions and standing in the international community.