London, England – The late Queen Elizabeth was reportedly angered by Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s assertion that she had approved of their decision to name their daughter Lilibet, according to a new book by author and royal expert Robert Hardman. The biography, titled “Charles III: New King. New Court. The Inside Story,” reveals that a member of staff described the queen, who passed away in 2022, as “as angry as I’d ever seen her” when Harry and Meghan made the announcement. The couple chose the name Lilibet as a tribute to Harry’s grandmother, as it was her nickname among loved ones.
Hardman’s book also addresses the controversy surrounding the name, claiming that the royal couple threatened legal action against anyone who disputed their claim. However, their efforts to involve Buckingham Palace were met with resistance. The book suggests that the queen’s official position on the matter may have differed from Harry and Meghan’s recollection. The BBC previously reported that the queen was not consulted about the use of her childhood nickname for the baby.
The book, which was released in January 2023, delves into the extensive family drama within the Firm. Hardman quotes a friend of King Charles, the late queen’s son, who expressed sadness over the ongoing rift between the two camps. However, the friend also noted that Charles has now moved on and is focusing on his new role as king.
It is worth noting that the book does not quote any specific royal sources or provide direct evidence of the queen’s feelings. The claims presented are based on the author’s insights and interviews with unnamed staff members and friends of the royal family.
The Sussexes, who are also parents to son Archie, have not responded to the book’s revelations. Buckingham Palace and representatives for the couple have not issued any comments on the matter either.
Overall, Hardman’s book provides a new perspective on the naming of Harry and Meghan’s daughter and sheds light on the tensions within the monarchy. The royal family’s response to the couple’s claims remains a subject of speculation and debate.